Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information please visit our Code of Conduct: Hyperledger Code of Conduct
Announcements (reminder)
- The Hyperledger /dev/weekly developer newsletter goes out each Friday to hundreds of Hyperledger developers. It is a collaborative effort. If you have a project release, pull request, community event, and/or relevant article you would like highlighted next week, please leave a comment for consideration on the upcoming newsletter wiki page.
- Hyperledger Mentorship Program
- please review 2021 program schedule
- submit a project proposal between now and March 11
- we're looking to select and fund 20-25 projects this year
- Hyperledger Global Forum - Virtual- June 8-10 - Call For Proposals (CFP) is now open (closes March 12th).
Quarterly reports
Upcoming reports
Discussion
- Standards work at Hyperledger
- Lab Sponsor - eliminate? expand? something else?
- MIT License used in HL-StarterKit lab
- Adopting a common set of labels such as "help wanted", "good first issue"?
- Breaking silos - SIG Request for support
Backlog
| Title | Status |
|---|---|
| DCI Working Group: Inclusive Naming Proposal | APPROVED |
| Project maturity metrics / Badging | PROPOSED
|
| DCO and Pseudonyms | PROPOSED
|
Recordings
Attended by:
- Angelo De Caro
- Arnaud J Le Hors
- Arun S M
Baohua Yang- Bobbi Muscara
- Danno Ferrin
- David Enyeart
- Gari Singh
- Grace Hartley
- Hart Montgomery
- Maria Teresa Nieto
Mark Wagner- Nathan George
Tracy Kuhrt- Troy Ronda
3 Comments
Hart Montgomery
I don't see an individual page to comment, so I'll just do it here. It seems to me that deciding whether or not (or to what degree) Hyperledger should be involved in standards work is at least a much of a question for the governing board as for the TSC. It is a "what are the goals of Hyperledger" question at least as much as a TSC question.
Do we know what the governing board thinks about this?
Brian Behlendorf
I plan on asking them on Tuesday, but didn't want to ask there before getting more clarity here.
Hart Montgomery
That makes perfect sense. Thanks for taking the initiative on this!
Perhaps at a TSC level we could discuss what different versions of "standards" might look like. The board might find this useful.