You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

Status
IN PROGRESS
Stakeholders
Outcome
Due date
Owner

Background

Whitepaper gave some information about Triggers and initial requirements about this functionality, but a lot of open questions comes into play when implementation details were discussed.

The design of Iroha Triggers mainly takes inspiration from:

  1. Database triggers - Oracle example
  2. Substrate weight and fee handling use cases in `pre-dispatch` and `post-dispatch` stages of transaction processing
  3. Smart contracts in other blockchains

Problem

Currently we can submit transactions that can modify global state if they pass validation. These transactions can contain `Query`s inside of them, allowing them limited capability to execute logic on-chain.
Transactions can include:

  1. Iroha Special Instrucions
  2. (Unclear if needed and not yet implemented) WASM blobs

Independently of their content type they will have limited capability as they will only be able to execute the contained logic once.


Though as it is established in blockchain space current use cases require a more sophisticated functionality to efficiently support DeFi:

Use CaseNeeds *

Swaps

Executed when user activates; Does several additional state validations; Manages liquidity;

Periodic Reward Distribution

Executed periodically; Distributes to all users satisfying certain condition;

Customizable and modifiable transaction fees


Stable coins

*- Algorithms for all of these use cases need to be on chain for transparency and safety guarantees, which are provided by consensus.


Other use cases for permissioned blockchains might include:

Use CaseNeedsComments
Transaction Metadata Validation

Permission Management


We can let all permissions be customizable and upgradeable during runtime if we use Triggers.


Solution


To execute arbitrary logic on-chain for unrestricted number of times other popular blockchains have Smart Contracts. Our solution for introducing smart contract functionality is called Triggers.




Iroha Special Instructions can not provide the fully fledged toolbox for all possible use cases because they lack an ability to react on changes in Iroha state. Iroha Triggers provide this functionality and in addition to Iroha Special Instructions give users full-scale functionality for almost any business scenario.

Triggers execution, in contrast to transaction execution, depends on condition.

Triggers can be either based on time or on a confirmed transaction (event). This is very powerful and enables Turing complete computation for Iroha's smart contracts.

  • Trigger at timestamp (every 5 minutes or after one hour)
  • Trigger at blockchain (new block, reach of some height, etc.)
  • Trigger at condition (new account, transfer of an asset, etc.)

Also, for cases like Iroha Permissions Module we will  need to be able to manage Triggers execution order - for example to execute them before block/transaction/instruction or after.

Order Book case

Users send bid and ask limit orders into the order book. Every order in the order book should be executed when counter order with the same price will be received. Speaking other word it should happen when bid meets ask at the same price. In this case limit order should be notified that there is a matching order and swap should be executed with resulting funds sent to the owners of both orders. Looks like this notification is reasonable to implement using triggers.

  1.  Challenging here is that there might be really a lot of orders in the order book and every order should have a trigger and every trigger should be checked somehow if price counter order exists or not.
  2. Another challenge is that after one order executed using a certain amount of funds of counter order, other orders having the same price cannot be executed on the same amount of the counter order funds. Other orders even for the same price should wait for new free fund amounts of counter orders.

Impure Triggers and Instructions

Because impure (I/O to 3rd party systems) Instructions and Triggers will not be supported by Iroha 2 - Iroha Events can be used to receive information by Cloud Events Consumers.




Peer can be a place to store Iroha Triggers. We can register new Triggers by Register<Peer, Trigger> Iroha Special Instruction. 

Because we depend on triggers a lot, we will have tight coupling between transactions processing and their execution. Every Iroha Special Instruction that changes Iroha state (domain related instructions category from Set of OOB ISIs) can Trigger, so we need to check Iroha Triggers that depend on conditions every instruction, Iroha Triggers that depend on blockchain every block and Iroha Triggers that depend on timestamp every block also. 

It is suggested to:

  • Store Triggers under Peer entity
  • Provide a Store (key-value) for each trigger - way to keep data between executions.
  • Provide a possibility to create technical accounts for Triggers where they might keep transferred funds.
  • Have the following Triggers categories:
    • Time-based
    • Block number-based
    • Transaction-based (can have a condition of whether they need to execute, similar to Oracle `when` condition)
    • Triggers that are triggered by specific ISI call - ExecuteTrigger(Params)
  • Have an ability to configure trigger order for Transaction Based triggers:
    • Before (transaction execution) - have the ability to check and fail or allow transaction
    • After (transaction execution)
  • Triggers will be build on top of Iroha Special Instructions and WASM
    • For instruction-based Triggers condition will be of `Instruction::Execute(Query)` type
    • All changes are declared as a set of Iroha Special Instructions or WASM

Triggers can be subdivided into the following categories and uses cases:

Time and Block Based

Decisions

Alternatives

  • Store Triggers as Assets - to much complexity and runtime dependent code
  • Execute Triggers sending new set of transactions - require networking communications, can end up in missing triggers

Concerns

  • Some complexity for end users
  • Open question about parameters propagation (condition → execution)

Assumptions

  • We do not have impurity inside Iroha and all Triggers can be replayed on different peers resulting in the same state of each consensus participant
  • For triggers we assume that time on different peers in some sync state with delays less or equal to block build time

Risks

  • Users will not be able to use Iroha Triggers in their business scenarios `[2; 8]`

Additional Information

  • No labels