Mission

In recent years, businesses and investors have become increasingly aware of climate change and are now taking positive action to stop it.  A great example is Microsoft's initiative to become carbon neutral and eventually carbon negative.  For these initiatives to succeed, multiple parties including institutional investors, major corporations, supply chain partners, environmentalist groups, government regulators, and the general public must now work together, sometimes for the first time.  This new collaboration in turn requires exchanging data and building trust across traditional boundaries.  

Today, this is simply not possible.  Some data, such as utility bills or shipping records, are held in those institutions' data siloes and are tedious to get.  Most data, though, is just not available.  Most products involve multiple materials and activities to manufacture and  distribute, and the data for the carbon footprint of their raw materials and activities are not available.  As a result, we're forced to rely on broad aggregates of economic output and do not have reliable carbon emissions data for any particular product. 

The solution is for members of a supply chain make the carbon emissions of their products and services available, so that it becomes easy to calculate the carbon emissions of products and services made from them.  Blockchain or distributed ledger technologies (DLT's) should be the backbone of any multi-party collaboration on climate change, because they are specifically designed for such scenarios.  They allow values, in this case of carbon emissions, to be tokenized and transferred through a supply chain of multiple, disparate parties across traditional national and industry boundaries.  With the blockchain, we could replace guesswork and approximations with hard data based on real transactions. 

The mission of this working group is to identify how DLT's could improve corporate or personal carbon accounting and make carbon neutral certifications more open, transparent, and credible.  We're here to help 

• Businesses and organizations take action on climate change by making the process easier and less costly.
• Certifying entities do more by streamlining the process for verifying corporate climate action.  
• General public and consumers trust corporate climate action with open and transparent analysis.
• Investment community gain deeper understanding of corporate sustianability claims through more data and analysis tools.

We will work closely with the Standards - WG as part of understanding the standards and implementing the technologies for climate accounting. 

Active Members

To help group members meet and interact with each other, people are welcome to add their contact information and your time zone to this page so that other participants can contact you directly. 

Adding your name here is optional and is not required to be a part of the group. 

To add your name in the directory below: you will need edit access to the wiki, and for this you need to get a free Linux Foundation ID. Once you have your LF ID (which you can use to log in the chat as well) you can log in and edit the table below with your information. After adding your name here, please also subscribe to the group's mailing list and post an introduction there so other group members can get to know you. You can also join the CA2 Hyperledger Chat group and make a personal introduction there and join the regular group meetings. 

Meetings

We will be part of the Hyperledger Climate Action and Accounting SIG Meetings – See you there!

Scope

The current scope of this working group includes:

• Identifying standards for corporate climate accounting and certifications.
• Providing recommendations on how DLT's could complement or improve current industry processes .
• Implementing open source DLT software for climate accounting and certifications.
• Promoting awareness and positive action in the larger Hyperledger and DLT community.
• Educating other stakeholders on the value of DLT's and Hyperledger in climate change.

Ongoing Work

Many companies today are starting to account for and limit their climate impact, going as far as trying to achieve carbon or climate neutrality. These corporate initiatives often involve several steps, including:

1. Auditing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
2. Establishing a plan for reducing the company's own emissions over time.
3. Purchasing carbon offsets to offset current emissions to achieve carbon neutrality.  
4. Obtaining a carbon neutrality certification from a certifying entity.  

Yet these steps are often difficult for the companies themselves and at times met with skepticism from the general public.  This is because of the challenges of data and trust.  

The Challenge of Data

A GHG emissions audit requires data from a lot of different sources, many outside of the company.  The Greenhouse Gas Protocol specifies three levels of emissions: Scope 1, 2, and 3, covering direct energy use (fuel burned on site), indirect energy use (energy purchased from utilities), and all other significant activities of the business, including products purchased, transportation of goods, travel and commuting of employees, and leased assets.

The problem is that most emissions come from activities which are hard to get data for.  At a minimum, the data would need to come from every part of the business, from purchasing to manufacturing to facilities management to human resources.  More importantly, it also involves data from a company's supply chain partners, such as the manufacturers of its products or components.  Those manufacturers, in turn, may not have this data or may not wish to publish it for competitive reasons.  Finally, what data could be obtained must often be gathered manually and entered into spreadsheets.   

The high cost or complexity of obtaining the data would require a judgement call about whether the activity is "significant" to the company's overall emissions or not, or whether generic or model data would be sufficient.  

The Questions of Trust

Knowing this, it's not hard to see why the general public could be skeptical of a company's climate action claims.  After all, as consumers,

• Can we trust the data that the company has provided? 
• Can we trust judgement calls, made by either the company or a certifying entity, about which activities are not relevant and thus do not require data and auditing?
• How do we know if the company is in fact working on its emissions reduction plan?
• Can consumers and investors trust that the certifying entity is objective?

Meanwhile, institutional investors such as the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance or Climate Action 100+ have a different trust issue.  They are used to more in-depth analysis and independent verification of companies' claims, and carbon neutral certifications do not have the same level of detail as other financial ratings they are accustomed to.  For example, when investing in bonds, it's not enough that one rating agency, such as Standard & Poors or Moody's, considers a bond "investment grade."  They typically require credit ratings by more than one rating agency, and the ratings are in tiers from AAA (highest credit quality) to CCC (high default risk.)   As climate neutrality becomes important to them, they would probably demand the same level of detail in ratings of corporate climate action.

Why DLT's

Fortunately, DLT's are by design suited for solving precisely these issues.  They are an "internet of value" where data could be transacted across different organizations through a shared ledger.  Furthermore, they are "trustless" networks and do not require trust in a single organization, whether it's the company making a climate action claim or an entity certifying it.  Instead, the architecture of DLT's allows multiple parties to come together and verify all claims independently with data and code.

In this case, a permissioned blockchain such as Hyperledger Fabric allows a company to share its data for independent verification by trusted parties.  Thus, it could provide transparency and protect privacy at the same time.  For example,

• A private channel could be set up for a company, its trusted data sources, and certifying entities. 
• The data sources could include tokens of carbon emissions from utilities, suppliers, shippers, and other sources.   By turning emissions data into tokens, they become standardized accounts of emissions that could be transferred across different organizations.  
• One or more certifying entities could have access to the data and use smart contracts to calculate the company's emissions based on the data on the private channel.
• The result could then be signed and published to a more public blockchain, for example as a token.

Hyperledger Fabric channels and chain code allow additional parties to audit a company's emissions without compromising any proprietary data.  For example, if an environmentalist group has questions about a company's reported emissions, it could develop its own smart contract for auditing emissions.  It could then ask that they be deployed, possibly by a neutral third party service provider, to the company's private channel.  The smart contract could audit the data and report its results without sharing the company's data.

Once the climate action claim has been verified, it could be tokenized on a public blockchain or passed along in another permissioned chain as an asset.  This allows the climate action claim, whether it's the GHG emissions of a product or a company's certified carbon neutrality, to be passed down the supply chain to its customers and made visible to the general public.

Why Open Source

Today, there are a lot of different environmental certifications, and the general public often doesn't know which one they could trust.  Thus, some consumers feel that any business which makes a pro-environment claim is "greenwashing," while many businesses feel that no matter what they do, it's not good enough. 

But what if we opened up the certifications process by creating open source software for verifying climate action based on data?  Then anybody could study a certification and understand how it works.  We could run several certifications on the same company, or even conduct studies comparing the certifications on a range of companies.

Furthermore, if the code for the certifications are open source, then anybody could extend an existing certification.  So if you feel that a certification process is too lax, make a better one yourself: Take an existing certification, add your enhancements, and publish it.  If people believe that your certification is better, then they could ask companies to run your code on their climate data channel. 

Thus, open source not only helps reduce the cost of certifications but also make it possible for them to become open and transparent, so that investors, consumers, and the general public could finally trust in the climate actions that businesse are taking.

How to Get Started

While carbon audits and certifications are complex, a lot of data could be obtained automatically now.  For example, utility bills, corporate travel, server usage, and shipping data could all be obtained by API calls. We're working on a Carbon Neutral Certification Minimum Viable Product (MVP) which will provide a demonstration of how to do this with Hyperledger.