You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Summary:

Planned Topics:

  • TBD

Note: This call is being recorded.

Date

(12PM Los Angeles, 3PM New York, Tuesday at 7AM Sydney)

Remember the Hyperledger Code of Conduct

Anti-Trust Policy:

Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy . If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

Attendees

        • Name (Organization) <email>


Welcome / Introductions

Announcements

Related Meetings Review

  • Ursa - Progress on packages and Plenum work.
  • Semantics - ODCA pilots underway - The agenda, video, notes, etc. from the HL Indy Semantics WG call: 
  • DID UX Call - Slack/Mailing list - details in the shared document as well minutes and additional information, currently focus on Purpose Based Services
  • SSI in IoT WG
  • Indy Contributors - Richard Esplin (Mon) - 
  • Identity WG / Identity WG Implementer calls (Wed / Thurs)

Upcoming Releases and Work Updates

Agenda

  • Issue Game: Can we close this? (15 min -) - issues (as time permits): 
  • HTTP over DIDComm
  • Concern with including Trust Ping and Feature Discovery in RFC 302 Richard Esplin
    • Non-interactive protocols require more thought.
    • These are important dev tools which we need in our ecosystem.
    • But we need to be careful with the UX. Responding to every ping or feature discovery request could compromise the privacy of end users.
    • In their current form, they should not be part of the interop profile.
    • I should be able to respond to these from the mediator (my cloud agent should be my butler and I should be able to configure it to screen my calls)
  • Open Discussion / Next Week Topics

Next Week

Future Topics

Action items

Call Recording

  • No labels