You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

  1. Discussion of RFC for Cramer-Shoup verifiable encryption.
    1. RFC could use more motivation on why we need it (Indy will use it).
    2. Generally well-written and well-done by Lovesh.
    3. Please follow-up and review yourself!
  2. Discussion of PKCS#11 led by Jon and Rebecca.
    1. Still more work needs to be done.
    2. We discussed the process:  going to merge previous work done by Jon and Rebecca.
  3. Potentially more basic interfaces for Ursa:  led by Lovesh.
    1. Password hashing, HMAC, etc.
    2. Dan:  good and bad reasons to wrap things (multiple implementations are a good reason).
    3. We need an RFC–TODO for Mike, Lovesh, Hart
  • No labels