...
- Documentation improvements: Michael B and Stephen C
- Need to review and prune out-of-date documentation (Alice / Faber treatment of pairwise DIDs is a key pain point)
- Michael is working on Indy Agent walkthrough using C#
- Finishing work on ReadTheDocs (2 more weeks?)
- SDK 2.0 architecture / Indy-Aries split (Sergey)
- Indy SDK Architecture Questions:
- Sovrin Foundation team and Daniel making progress
- Will work on defining the API surface in order to better understand what the threading model should be underneath
- Need to define how we want to handle private keys. Shouldn't expose them to the end users, but need to access them from multiple libraries.
- Feels pressure to make short term decisions that can be improved incrementally. Will also help Kiva to contributeAnxious to start moving, and iterating.
- GitLab migration (Mike and Steve G)
- Demos in the Identity Implementers WG calls
- Issues with Jenkins machines because Rust builds run out of memory—workaround increased build time but is a temporary solution
- Advanced Schemas and W3C creds (Ken)
- Can successfully write and retrieve the Context object from the node code. Will track through all layers up to Aries.
- 5 additional objects need to be added.
- Warnings from rust cargo clippy (Mike and Axel)
- IS-1270 through IS-1274
- New design for revocation / Anoncreds 2.0 (Mike)
- Would be useful to have a comparison in performance between Anoncreds 1.0 and Anoncreds 2.0
- First draft is latex document in Ursa repo. Will be published as PDF and HTML.
- Need a plan for changes to Indy Node
- HIPE for overall changes, then a design PR for the changes specific to the different repos.
https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/tree/master/design
- HIPE for overall changes, then a design PR for the changes specific to the different repos.
- Getting Ursa artifacts published that can be used by Indy Node and Indy SDK (Mike and Cam)
...
- fuzzing libindy https://github.com/AxelNennker/indy-sdk/tree/fuzzing/
`cargo +nightly fuzz run fuzz_target_1 -- -only_ascii=1`
Worried about unsafe code in libindy
```
ignisvulpis@namenlos:~/development/hyperledger/indy-sdk/libindy$ find src -name \*\.rs -exec fgrep unsafe {} \; | wc -l
61
``` - PostgreSQL leaving experimental status (see previous discussion)
- Maintainership requirements for Indy Node and Indy SDK
- Partially completed refactoring of the Request format: INDY-1375 and IS-567
Future Calls
- Fully Qualified DID support in Indy SDK
- New pack / unpack requires disclosure of recipient
- Cannot hide the receiver of the message like we could with msg_pack
- Allows having multiple recipients of the same message
- Should list the drawback in the Aries-RFC? Is there an alternative way that preserves the capability to selectively disclose the recipient?
- From Kyle Den Hartog
msg_pack presents problems when dealing with an agent that maintains more than one relationship. For example, if I receive a message, I don't know which key in my agent I should be using to decrypt the message. We can get sender anonymity or receiver anonymity, but I don't believe it's possible to get both and still determine who the message is for. - Pack/unpack only exposes the Verkey of the recipients. It does not do forward secrecy.
- Ursa and AMCL: Discussed in the Ursa call (August 21), but no decision yet.
- Architecture questions for Indy SDK:
- How to handle old pull requests that failed DCO Checks? Close?
- How to handle pull requests for IOS / Swift wrappers? Close and encourage the move to Aries?
- How to handle pull requests for LibVCX? Deprecate?
- Close PR https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-sdk/pull/1048 as something that will be replaced by the advanced schema work?
- HIPE pull requests: https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-hipe/pulls
...