Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information please visit our Code of Conduct: Hyperledger Code of Conduct
Announcements
- Community Calendar Re-org (Huseby)
- STEP ZERO:
If you are a maintainer of a project or a chairperson/vice-chairperson of a SIG/WG...Please email dhuseby@linuxfoundation.org ASAPSUBJECT: <Project/WG/SIG Name> Mod mePlease email me from the account you use for lists.hyperledger.org OR include that email address in the body of the email.
- The following groups do not have a moderator volunteer:
Avalon- Caliper
CelloComposer- Explorer
FabricIrohaPerformance and Scalability WGQuilt- Sawtooth
- Smart Contracts WG
- The following groups have HL staff moderators but should have a community moderator volunteer:
- Grid
- Public Sector SIG
- Social Impact SIG
- Supply Chain SIG
- Telecom SIG
- STEP ONE:
- Look at the existing Hyperledger Community Calendar and note which events are for your project/SIG/WG.
- Create calendar events in the correct calendar for your project/SIG/WG on https://lists.hyperledger.org
- How to schedule a meeting: schedule_a_meeting.mp4
- How to delete a meeting: delete_a_meeting.mp4
- STEP TWO:
- Subscribe to the new community: https://lists.hyperledger.org/ics/1902217/3131022486068381536/feed.ics
- Verify that your project/SIG/WG events are present in the community calendar
- STEP THREE:
- Please email dhuseby@linuxfoundation.org
- SUBJECT: <Project/WG/SIG Name> Calendar Migration Complete
- Please email dhuseby@linuxfoundation.org
- STEP ZERO:
Quarterly reports
- 2019 Q4 Hyperledger Performance and Scalability WG
- 2019 Q4 Hyperledger Transact
- 2019 Q4 Hyperledger Cello
Upcoming reports
Decisions
- Working Group Task Force proposals:
Discussions
- TSC Election voters selection
- Last election process: git commit crawler from Tracy, nominations from SIGs and WGs, and self-nominations by Google form.
- Besu: ready for active status?
Outstanding Decisions
Title |
---|
No content found. |
3 Comments
Gari Singh
Arnaud J Le Hors For the discussion items, which items will we actually "vote" on? I assume the WG item? And is the vote at this point to simply keep the WG name and state that WG's don't have to provide deliverables? I saw the discussion about stating Was do not / cannot provide deliverables, but if we are going to vote on something, it would be good to have an explicit (list of) items to vote on / choose from.
I also REALLY, REALLY, REALLY hope we can get to the Besu discussion. Not so much because of Besu, but to actually discuss this whole project status topic.
Arnaud J Le Hors
I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY expect to get to the Besu discussion.
Seriously, I don't expect us to spend much time on the other agenda items. I do have to point out that we've already had plenty of discussion on the meaning of Active status and I sure hope we don't have to walk down again old beaten paths.
In response to your request for greater clarity on what I expect us to vote on I have now separated the agenda items into a decisions section and a discussion section. The downside is that it may be read as implying more than what's intended. Indeed I don't want to preclude discussion from happening on the decision items, and don't want to preclude the possibility of making decisions on discussion items.
Dan Middleton
Yeah in my experience we often have to judge when we are ready to vote based on the discussion.