Agenda:
Discuss the activity classes and categories of the IPCC and ISIC and how we can use them to compare/differentiate the levels on which different standards and methodologies operate/report.
Recording:
|
Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct. |
|---|
Time:
- Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 08 AM Pacific
- Add CA2 SIG Standard WG calls to your calendar
Dial-In Information: [ZOOM]
You can join either from your computer or from your phone:
- From computer: https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community.backup?pwd=dkJKdHRlc3dNZEdKR1JYdW40R2pDUT09
- From phone: +1(855)880-1246 (toll free US number) or view International numbers
- Meeting ID: 403 498 3298
Meeting Notes
Don't aggregate anything off-chain (this implies that we need to have an extensive hierarchy that can absorb even the smallest bit of data and aggregate it appropriately on behalf of the user).
The categories proposed by the GHG Protocol's Scope 3 Calculation guideline is another possible angle from which we can build up an activity hierarchy (i.e. from the life-cycle angle instead of from the industry angle like IPCC and ISIC do).
Note: not all calculators/standards currently use the same unit of measure.
Challenge: it's impossible to accurately quantify the carbon footprint of every activity - there are too many variables. Sacrificing good for perfect?
1 Comment
Alex Aruj
As a follow-up from what Sherwood posted on the main Standards wiki page, I am asking for latest info on standards for business sustainability from Interwork Alliance PR Jessie Hennion https://interworksdev.wpengine.com/standardizing-sustainability-how-the-iwa-will-make-this-happen/ and Marley Gray Azure Engineering https://www.linkedin.com/in/marleygray/