Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

**DRAFT TO UPDATED FOLLOWING MEETING**

Assessment of group health

On basic health indicators the group is OK;

  • Meetings are taking place as scheduled every two weeks (although one meeting was missed)
  • Agendas and notes are kept
  • Recordings are linked to the wiki

Attendance at the meetings has declined through the last quarter to about 7 where it has stabilized.  The change to daylight saving has made the group harder to attend for members in Asia Pacific

  • Membership of the email list service continues to grow, with 2-3 new joiners each week and total membership over 100

Issues being faced by the group

  • Address declining attendance on the calls
  • The activity is focussed on presentations by group members and guests.  We need to decide as a group whether we wish to move beyond this towards the kind of collaborative working that other SIG groups have done.  It may be that the make-up of the membership means that this is not feasible.

Summary of activity in the past quarter

  • Keynote presentations from We-Trade and Clearmatics
  • A run-down of latest news from the world of Trade Finance Blockchain.  This provides a good source for future presentations

List of planned work products

  • Specific presentations on trade finance platforms

Assessment of participant diversity (consider several factors, including organizational, geographic, gender, and skill level diversity)

  • Organizational;  most attendees on the calls are from the software industry or consulting
  • Geographic;  Since daylight saving started, call attendance is from Europe and South Asia.  List participation is wider and includes Americas and Asia Pacific
  • Gender; Although the make-up is predominantly male, there are female members of the SIG. Active participation is more evenly split.
  • Skill level.  There is insufficient information to assess skill level.  Knowledge levels vary, but in a constructive way as the meetings feature a lot of knowledge sharing.

Any additional information

  • to update following the call
  • No labels