...
Example: GHG reduction through efficient cookstoves | Example: Recycling electronics | What is specific or generic about it? | |
|---|---|---|---|
1. Desired end state | Climate stability | Environment without toxic materials. Fair and efficient use of limited resources (e.g. metals). | Both relate to goals articulated in the SDGs |
2. SDG aligned to desired end state | SDG 13: combat climate change and its impacts | SDG 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns | |
3. Causal model related to the end state | "GHG emissions lead to climate change" | "If dumped in landfills, incinerated or incorrectly recycled, toxic materials from electronic device components are released into the environment. " | |
4. Target intermediate states and activities | Limit GHG emissions | Target 12.5 "By 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse" | |
| 5. Activity and state metrics | Express GHG emissions in terms of the global warming potential of 1 tonne of CO2 over 100 years | Mass of e-waste recycled % of all e-waste recycled from a specific facility, area or agent | Generic: all state metrics have a unit of measure, an underlying rationale, and an argument for their credibility. |
6. Agent responsibility model and entity demarcation | Households own and operate cookstoves | Cities and municipalities operate waste services within their jurisdiction | The principles according to which agents are identified and entities and activities are demarcated are probably fairly generic. |
7. Scenario comparisons (counterfactual or real) | Households are assumed to optimise their utility but established patterns have a certain inertia. It is assumed that adoption of new stoves will take place if there are no barriers to such adoptions. | Methods for establishing scenarios are also probably very generic | |
8. Data transformations | A specific methodology will typically prescribe the calculation procedures | All transformations have to be rational and repeatable | |
9. Data gathering | A specific methodology will typically prescribe the data collection procedures. | Scientific methods of observation and measurement have wide application and acceptance |
Generic formulation
An agent deliberately engages in an activity.
The activity impacts some state about which there is broad consensus.
The agent presents a claim about the outcome of the activity they undertook and the nature and magnitude if the impact that it had/s on the state.
Standards determine the content and structure of such a claim and allow a third party to assess the veracity of thereof.
...
Ontology
(What are the 'things' that the system should know about?
What are the defining properties or characteristics of each 'thing'?)
...
Agents
...
- unique identifier (identity)
- type (individual or group; if group, what type of group, e.g. organisation, company or movement; auditor)
...
An agent asserts their identity
...
Digital signature
Demonstration of control (challenge-response)
Activities
...
- activity class (e.g. IPCC categories)
- activity description
- location
- start time
- end time (possibly)
- agent
- input(s) (e.g. materials and energy; consumables and non-consumables)
- output(s) product + waste
- process(es)
objective (experience, create, reduce, destroy, avoid, verify) (optional / not required in all instances)
* An audit is a special type of activity where the input is a claim and the output is an evaluation of that claim.
...
Ex ante: An agent asserts their intentions to act in a Projet Design Document (PDD)
Ex post: An agent describe their actions in a Projet Design Document (PDD)
The activity and its results and impacts are documented by the agent at intervals in a monitoring report (MR)
...
- unique identifier
...
States
...
- state definition
- location and extent
- point in time
- metrics
- type (actual [measured] or baseline [counterfactual])
*State as in environmental state (not political state)
...
Indicators for states
Indicators delivered by agents via PDDs and MRs
...
- unique identifier
- Impact claim per state
...
- name
- definition
- unit of measure
- rationale
- calculation
- credibility
...
- unique identifier
...
- name
- author(s)
- applicability - type of agent, type of activity, state
- requirements (e.g. reporting requirements, calculation requirements)
- version
- method(s)
- precision
- accuracy / std error
- emission factors (defaults)
...
- unique identifier
Someone or something gathers data
- observes a phenomenon using some instrument
Someone or something presents data as a claim
Someone or something evaluates the claim
Should there be an event class? An event is like an activity but without the intention of an agent. An accident is an event but it is not an activity.
(Where do impact claims fit in? Standards contain requirements for claims and claims are made up of indicators and assertions)
An impact claim (a state change claim)
- agent
- activity
- "before" state
- "after" state
- causal connection between activity and the resultant state (e.g. scope 1 (primary/secondary), scope 2 or scope 3)
- standard followed
For discussion: Where do we list the natural processes that lead to climate change?
(emission factors are indicators)
The choice
SDG goal
The SDG goals are described as a set of targets under each SDG.
...
Measured part
Counterfactual part
...
Testing the framework with a practical use case: personal climate footprint calculators
Calculators
| Parameter | Footprint calculator | Climate Neutral Now |
|---|---|---|
| URL | https://www.footprintcalculator.org | https://offset.climateneutralnow.org/footprintcalc |
| Owner /operator | Global Footprint Network | UNFCCC |
| Agent | Individual or households | Individual or households |
| Activities | ||
| "Scope 2" activities | ||
| "Scope 3" activities | ||
| States | Global atmospheric CO2 contentration | Global atmospheric CO2 contentration |
| Global atmospheric methane contentration | ||
| I | ||
Theme 2: Ontology languages and editors
...