Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Agenda

  •  Housekeeping
  • General Announcements
    • Logo Discussion - Image Modified
      • No issues among maintainers - looks fine 
  • Release updates

    ...

        • NOTES ON CALL:
          • Good:
            • Can merge to main
            • Good squash/commit history
            • Can easily abort release candidates that fail and does not create candidate docker images that users may pick up by accident 
          • Bad:
            • Different SHAs for cherry picks, more fraught history
            • Need admin to disable branch protection rules for new release branches 
          • Only Gary and Simon have used this release process 
          • Human required process needs to identify which SHA commit we start the release from 
          • Need work around automation and process itself 
          • 23.10.0 -
            • Should take this into the automation realm → iterating on scripts for release automation 
          • Fabio would like to try this process on next release 
          • We will pilot this release process before making it official - perhaps in 24.1.0 
      • 23.7.3-RC release update from Ameziane - Memory usage investigations on 23.7.3-RC
        • PLAN FROM CALL: 
          • Check with Danno RE required release timeline for Swirld's Labs
            • If needed within a week: cherry pick on 23.7.3 for a .4 release
            • Otherwise, include in 23.10.0 and begin burn-in on Friday after code freeze 
      • Enterprise Releases proposal - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oeI2fq3jBYFyQHj4kHb1OemAzI1L6DRudkEtZRSYabM/  - NOTES BELOW: 
        • Starting point → Release candidate is cut and socialized with ALL contributor groups 
        • RCs can be tested within any organizations environment and with their own testing suite and then results are socialized
          • Socializing RCs for parties in the #besu-release channel 
          • Normal time-bound is Friday → Wed/Thurs of the following week 
          • Agreement on results can pause a release → This is probably where we need the most consensus among maintainers
        • Extension of acceptance tests for private / permissioned chains ?
        • Need to iron out what process may be used for private chains (Kaleido action item, perhaps) 
        • Need to ensure we are marrying up use-case distributions work discussed previously (modularity) with an interim strategy here 
        • Consider docker and kubernetes setups and other cloud environments, perhaps 
      • Defaults:
        • Snap, Bonsai, and Archive 
        • Private networks do care about these features and will need to understand what will be the impact to their networks 
    • Work Updates
      • Cancun
        • devnet 9 -

    ...

        • already started, besu is contributing with a minor stake. encountering proposal problems still being debugged.
        • hive tests relevant to devnet 9 are all passing but 4, 1 of those is pending update from test authors.
    • Other Business
      • Proposal: Discord Server Pub/Priv Channel Split - unanimous at this stage for the "besu enterprise" channel name
        • "besu-enterprise" as a great name for private/enterprise use-cases
        • Landed on two recommendations in Matt N's comment on the proposal above 
      • [ACCEPTED] DEBUG Log Improvement Proposal - reminder about this one, looking for feedback. If no major objections will make it a policy and continue submitting PRs to make our current logging conform.
    • Open Forum
      • /add item/
    • Future Topics
      • /add item/


    Recordings

    Widget Connector
    urlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wKQrkXgKIs&list=PL0MZ85B_96CHpqsKmljUK8HB98wK67RjC&index=1

    Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0MZ85B_96CHpqsKmljUK8HB98wK67RjC