Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Onboarding processes are established on nearly every online service using social login via OIDC This is easy, but involves a central identity provider such as LinkedIn Facebook google etc, see this page of hyperledger foundation:
  2. The current solution is user friendly and everyone love to use it, mostly with an two factor authentication, which involves often the mobile phone and a password. 
  3. The social login is integrated in the process like start-button on windows desktop, but every time I use it, the central identity provider notice this and can learn more about the behavior of the user. For example, I logged in here using linkedIn, so LinkedIn will provide me some advertisement around Linux foundation. 
  4. And if I'm not logged in in LinkedIn, I need to login again, which means I need to know my password
  5. Summary of Problems:
    1. The users User's behavior is tracked in the current services, which makes the user to a product of social identity provider!
    2. The user Users need to remember so much too many passwords! 


→ To strengthen the statement we did Market Research to this topic in : check the Appendix below

Summary of the client research: Since the goal is to be accepted by the market and leverage hyperledger projects on the market, we started your journey with a market research. We can clearly show the needs of the market as a result of online research and from a customer survey. First, we research the web and publications about security and hyperledger projects and it came out, that overall the need for secure communication and secure exchange of personal data exists, especially in not trackability of activities and preventing personal data storage and the risk of data breaches. 

...