...
Excerpt |
---|
Planned:
|
...
- Update: GitHub actions led by Kevin Griffin Wade Barnes - We need a GHA pipeline for Ubuntu 16.04
- Indy-Node
- CI for Indy Node - merged
- CD for Indy Node - active development - no official PR ready - patterns from plenum have been implemented waiting on Plenum
- Stable to Master merge - ready and being reviewed by Wade.
- Ubuntu 20.04 Upgrade
- Can we close the RMarsh PR in favour of later PRs? Need to get a status of later PRs
- Richard is indicating that it is done, but not clear. Tests are running under GHAs.
- No CI so not clear how that is indicated.
- Should we be merging to trigger CI/CD?
- In process, but reintroducing things that were deleted, reverting state
- Can we close the RMarsh PR in favour of later PRs? Need to get a status of later PRs
- Indy-Plenum
- CI for Indy Plenum - merged
- CD for Indy Plenum - draft done - the publishing is not added, but will be – fairly easy - Issue 1526 (Robin - DCO) - PR1526ready but not merged
- Waiting on Wade for where to put the artifacts - decision Hyperledger Artifactory - to be setup today/tomorrow.
- Robin is on vacation through April 20. May need to try to get someone else to work on this. Robin to add comment on GitHub issue with status.
- In PR is ability to run the GHAs off different branches.
- Stable to Master merge In process - some issues found, but PR resolves them - waiting for review- Merged
- Indy-SDK
- CI/CD for Indy-SDK looks good – paused - ready to move forward (ABSA work).ready, Wade to review - waiting for Jenkins to sign off on the build (happening as we speak)
- Jenkins/GHAs to run in parallel for a bit, while the GHA are finalized.
- CI – deprecating that sooner than later
- CD – need the right triggers to fire (e.g. if PR merges to master and updates the tag, publishes artifacts)
- Sovrin Release - Wade Barnes
- Working on CI/CD - Resource found for that, starting soon - Anmol Singh Devin Smith - contractor through Sovrin
- Will be adding Ubuntu Dev environment fixed, build environment fixed, tests fixed, working on the Ubuntu 20.04 supportupgrade
- Should be done soon.
- indy-test-automation – had been working, but it is dependent on the Sovrin packages that are not made yet.
- Need to research the publishing of the artifacts from GHA to the Sovrin repos – it's magic right now, needs to be brought into the open.repos
- Before – indy and sovrin artifacts were in Sovrin repos
- To Be Done – indy artifacts will be hosted on Hyperledger Artifactory; Sovrin on Sovrin repositories
- Indy-Node
- Next Indy-Node release – need CD completed. Once done, then we can plan the final steps to produce a release.
- Wade to work on a checklist for what is needed, and who is doing what for the initial release.
- Working on tests related to Python 3.8 upgrade – most are running, 4-5 to go, parallel looking at specific packages to be updated
- All tests resolved
- CI-CD changes for plenum Ubuntu in progress / getting close
- Do we still need to build the deb files of rocksdb or can we directly use https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/focal/rocksdb at v. 5.17.2? In Ubuntu 16.04 we use rocksdb v. 5.8.8
- Indy Contribution Campaign
- Timing – HGF coming up – timing perhaps best is after HGF
- Video – 3 month lead time on that – Digital Identity
- Look at second half of the year – but we need to get started
- Indy DID Method Spec organizing
- Adding to the NYM transactions (write and read) a "diddocContent" item, instead of putting it into an associated ATTRIB
- Per Sergey K – may want to use ATTRIB storage for the item instead of adding it to the NYM on the ledger
- Old Indy-SDK epic, old Indy epic, (must login to see epics)
- Adding to the NYM transactions (write and read) a "diddocContent" item, instead of putting it into an associated ATTRIB
- Indy-SDK – done. 1.1.16 is in the wild! Merge still needs to be done, but it's ready. All other steps are done.Status of indy-sdk CI/CD
- DONE: Indy Node Maintainers.md, and CODEOWNERS in Indy Node and Indy Plenum
- Updated CODEOWNERS list: WadeBarnes Toktar brentzundel esplinr sergey.khoroshavin, udosson, m00sey, ianco, and askolesov
- Hyperledger standard Maintainers document?
- Use GitHub groups instead of CODEOWNERS? Ry set this up. We just need to approve his changes.
- Sovrin Network Upgrade process:
- Inputs: New CI/CD, OS Upgrade, Post Feb. 2020 functionality (e.g. Rich Schema), indy-crypto vs.
- ursa-crypto
- Today: 16.04 with no post Feb 2020, Functionality, mix of indy-crypto/ursa-crypto
- Release 1: Another 16.04 using the new CI/CD code
but no code changesplus the Post-Feb. 2020 changes- Concern: Have the new GHAs been made ONLY for 20.04? Not supposed to be, but TBD.
- Release 2: Ubuntu 20.04 matching Release 1. One at a time – create new 20.04 node, remove their 16.04 node, add their 20.04 node
Release 3: Post Feb. 2020 changes
Future Calls
Next call:
Future:
...