Let us know how we are doing

Take the DCI Working Group's new survey!

Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata


Trade Finance securitization and the Blockchain: 

    • Trade Finance has suffered from a funding gap, since large banks who are the primary providers of financing are loath to deal with SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises), there is a $1.5 Trillion funding gap (ICC) and ADB.
    • The gap is larger for women and minority owned SMEs.
    • The “duration” of Trade Finance is shorter.
    • Many banks hold  TF on their books, requiring capital to be locked up  
    • There is a lot of money looking for a home due to low and negative interest rates.
    • Trade finance can be securitized, but this can be an onerous process 
    • The secondary market is less developed due to lack of ratings which prevents investment by institutions
    • Many Trade Finance blockchain consortia exist, but interoperability of these is an issue, solutions for these may include networks of networks (proposed by Marco Polo, and Unbounded- although by the rules we may be prohibited from mentioning specific products)
    • Unlocking value is possible through  a combination: increasing flow, creating mechanisms for easier and more accurate ratings (automatic rating schemes using AI or smart contracts or both), interoperating between consortia- all possible through increased access to higher quality information in a standardized way through Blockchain - this is our thesis (not in any of the references)
    • This will have the effect of closing the TF gap, increasing trade finance especially for the smaller Enterprises, reducing capital requirements for banks by stimulating a healthy secondary market; allowing more capital to enter the arena (from Institutional Investors)
  • No labels