You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

  1. PR Discussion:  Zmix
    1. Dan:  it's not clear how some of the stuff works.
      1. Dan:  more cryptographic detail needed?
    2. Manu:  goal to express functionality, not too much cryptographic detail.
    3. TODO:  Manu and Dan to add cryptographic background and references to Zmix RFC
    4. TODO:  we need to modify the RFC requirements to include cryptographic background and references.
  2. PR Discussion:  PS Signatures and Delegatable Credentials
    1. Lovesh:  some RFCs to go over here.
    2. Mike and Manu:  we could reform the RFCs.
      1. In addition to background references...
      2. Do we need such an emphasis on the API?
  • No labels