Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Hyperledger Labs have been a very important proving ground. For example for re-use of code and concepts between the SIGs, the eThaler project developed for the lab has seen the code for its token re-used on the Climate Action & accounting SIG. There are many other success stories.

Review the language in the labs charter on Sponsors.

Proposers need a Sponsor (i.e. a maintainer of one of the Hyperledger projects, a TSC member or a WG chair);

From the Process To Propose A New Lab

The sponsor(s) are responsible for reviewing the proposal. Sponsors do not have a responsibility beyond this; ongoing work like contributing code or reviews is not tied to their role as sponsors. In reviewing the proposal, the sponsor(s) make sure that the proposal is cogent, and novel (in conception, proposed execution, or interested community). To find sponsors a. the proposers can use their connections to existing projects and ask maintainers b. find working groups or projects with affinities to the proposed lab and pitch the project (good to have the template already filled out) in associated channels and or mailing lists. The WG chairs emails, the maintainers contacts etc. can be found on the wiki or github. Make personal appeals if you can.

This language was created to clarify the role of the Sponsor as well as to guide proposers in finding Sponsors, since we (the lab stewards) had several reports about the friction in finding Sponsors. 

Specific cases:

Not all labs follow Apache 

About the licensing issue in labs, two projects with no license file, 3 with CC-By-4.0 and of course the one with MIT. All others (37) have Apache 2.0- Sponsors nor lab stewards are not setup to catch this, suggest adding this to repolinter or to automation when creating the labs similar to the checks for DCO.

Governance

Current practice is for sponsors to be involved just at the inception of the lab. Sponsor requirement has always been a box-ticking exercise. Lab Stewards have consistently read and commented on lab proposals to improve the quality of submission and sometimes challenge the purpose of the lab.

...