Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Release Status
    1. PBFT ordering service
    2. Mir BFT continues
    3. Participation API - no system channel
    4. Config transaction - simplification is welcome
    5. Deployment guide
    6. Snapshot and checkpoint in progress
    7. BYFN confirmed removed
    8. gateway discussion
  2. Eastern hemi update
  3. Contribution diagram discussion from JWG:https://chat.hyperledger.org/channel/fabric-docs-japanese?msg=LpknNwdm4HrQYieeP
    1. Excellent diagram
    2. Chris exposition on workflow
    3. Place in Contributing guide
  4. Deployment Guide discussion
    1. Extensive discussion
      1. Most important config discussions (core.yaml values)
      2. Database recommendations (Couch vs Level — off chain backups?)
      3. HA
      4. Sizing
      5. Leaders and anchors
    2. Will be 2.0 release focussed, which is correct
      1. i.e. not 1.4
      2. LTS oriented
  5. Documentation Campaign
    1. New Spanish Working group
    2. The importance of recognition
    3. Being more intentional to tap into more channels
      1. Can we make broader use Twitter, Blog etc etc?
    4. Haven't been too public yet to promote
      1. Is it time to do a campaign?
      2. Exploit more Hyperledger channels
      3. Help existing WG gets more members
      4. Helps new WGs start up
    5. Blog from international community has more weight
      1. Happy to help, but should be from international team
      2. Blog and video to put together
      3. How to make more available?
      4. Who else would contribute
    6. Next step to create Blog and Video
    7. Excellent material in David's agenda topic (above)
    8. Important to have CI pipeline for JA, ML, PTBR
    9. What are the key steps?
      1. New WG
      2. New repo directory
      3. New translation language
      4. Fully complete documentation
      5. (Other contributors, and broader recognition, esp for non-commercial organizations)
      6. This is important — recognition
        1. Renato and Chris agreed on wider contributor badge
        2. How would writers like to be recognized
      7. Excellent points from Chris
        1. Confirmed by Oumar and Renato
        2. Twitter shout out and digital badges are important - Oumar
    10. Sample badges shown
  6. Pt_BR update from Renato
    1. Doubling in size of group!
    2. Japanese group workflow is helpful
    3. Helpful to teach new Pt_BR contributors
  7. Google analytics is available
    1. Baseline for campaign
    2. Need to see if data is relevant
    3. Sanity check on data being looked at
    4. PRs vs JIRA - has the former become more important
    5. More detail/discussion on next call
    6. What other data might be relevant?
    7. Feeds into eminence
    8. Approved commits etc are important milestones
    9. Detailed session next week - Joe/Pam
      1. Very important insights
      2. How many pages are translated/coverage?
  8. Recording uploaded

Video of this week's session at: Recordings

...