Versions Compared

Old Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Anthony O'Dowd

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Anthony O'Dowd

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Release status:
    1. Pam/Joe Dashboard: https://jira.hyperledger.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10104
    2. Contributor call recap.
  2. Contributors topic for new languages
  3. How to do a small doc change
    1. End to end walk-through from Joe Alewine
  4. HLF internals docs
  5. Create channel tutorial
  6. BFT update
  7. LTS RFC update
  8. Fabric CA Deployment updates
    1. Including Considerations when using Kubernetes and Docker
    2. use of -M in place of FABRIC_CA_CLIENT_MSPDIR env var https://hyperledger-fabric-ca.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.4/clientcli.html
    3. added `--enrollment.profile tls` when enrolling with the TLS ca


Discussion

  1. Release status: Pam, Joe
    1. Config transaction library - create some higher level transactions for updating channels etc
    2. Hadera hashgraph also discussed on contributors call
    3. BFT work proceeding
    4. Deployment guide progress
    5. Test network progress
    6. CA doc in good shape
    7. Google doc being created for checkpoint/archive. RFC soon
    8. Go smart contracts already in
    9. Go SDK doing well
  2. Contributors topic for new languages
    1. Need ability for other users to show how to do this
    2. Need help from Rich Zhao
    3. Keep as aide memoir here
  3. Small doc change video tutorial from Jo
  4. HLF documentation
    1. Quick review. Very valuable
    2. How to maintain, how is it kept current
    3. PPT is not ideal
    4. Live in markdown, and keep it current
    5. Great content
    6. if it were in markdown, much easier to maintain
    7. Sit in 1.4 repo, and go through changes at right time as it evolved
    8. Architecture reference material for peers and chaincode container is excellent
    9. What are key concepts below in the docs
    10. Architecture reference material
    11. Developer related information
    12. Who is the target personae for this content
    13. This looks like great low level design document
    14. Would use it for debugging – for developing fabric content, but could some of it be relevant for end user developers
      1. Look at repo for design docs
    15. It uses old lifecycle, rather then new lifecycle – needs to be update for 2.0
    16. Could write a tool to say how close doc code was to actual code
    17. really great material – who is the consumer, not relevant for chaincode developer
    18. needs to be shaped for the right auidence
    19. How much needs to be in the docs
    20. Get feedback from the community on progress
    21. full stack developers right now
    22. this is useful for most developers in the real world
    23. DWG interested in content even as-is
    24. Need to have information out there
    25. It's very low level
    26. First few slides, drop too low for customer
  5. Other topics deferred to next week<Minutes>


Video of this week's session at: Recordings

...