Versions Compared

Old Version 186

changes.mady.by.user Ry Jones

Saved on

compared with

New Version 187

changes.mady.by.user Bobbi Muscara

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
  • Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
  • Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information, please visit our  Hyperledger Code of Conduct


8/20

Presentation Assignment

use case testing

  1.  Hyperledger AnonCreds v2.0 Working Group Meetings

    When:
    Monday, August 21, 2023
    7:00am to 8:00am
    (UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles

    Where:
    https://zoom.us/j/98881501347?pwd=WURjV3BJYkhtUjg5STVwNHYvakdyZz09

    Organizer: Stephen Curran swcurran@cloudcompass.ca

    View Event

    Description:
    A bi-weekly meeting to discuss AnonCreds v2.0.  The focus of these meetings is to decide what features are needed in a breaking change implementation of AnonCreds. The goal of AnonCreds v2.0 is to retain and extend the privacy-preserving features of AnonCreds v1.0, while improving capabilities, performance, extensibility, and security. Specifically, we are looking at:

    - Enabling the use of additional kinds of ZKPs -- range proofs, set membership/non-membership, blinded encryption, and equality of attributes across credentials, etc.

    - Enabling the use of different underlying cryptographic signatures -- BBS+, PS (with the potential for a PQ version), CL.

    - A new revocation scheme.

    - Formatting the credential and presentation in a way that matches the W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model Standard

    Progress on the specification has moved forward, and we're beginning work on the documentation -- evolving the AnonCreds v1.0 specification to the v2.0 version.


8/14


Bobbi

Gianluca

Ramakrishna V

...