Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Categories - bullets. Please +1 or -1 for priority and value to the topic of Obstacles in the capital markets sector. Target audience is business stakeholders who want to better understand the direct value add of blockchain. Additional angle, how x is relevant to capital markets. Use cases. A lot of vulnerabilities applicable for the public chain; private deployment or Ethereum, are we leveraging the EVM. Which vulnerabilities are consensus protocol, communication layer, will boil down to specifics of where applicable. Helpful to have a thorough survey of vulnerabilities. See where they apply to proposed implementations. Where can technologies be used in capital market systems? Paper, as a whole - vast. A lot of headings. Too many? Target audience? Ideas need to link together, use cases. Change is foreign, business stakeholders bring up obstacles to adopting new technologies. Educating ways to overcome the obstacles; share what people are doing to overcome obstacles and adopt new technologies. Behavioral obstacles. Choices presented (in a manner of some ideas of behavioral economics). May not win over on technical merits, logic alone. A well-articulated, well thought through set of points will be helpful in assuaging some of the fears. One of the first questions asked by business stakeholders PoC - has it been implemented in production, has it been launched, what has actually been done? If we build up a library of implementations - point to specific use cases would be of benefit. Each header item in the paper will be linked, if possible to a solution of the perceived obstacle. Keep lightweight with links to the publicly available information. Difficult to find other than press releases. Consider new markets built. One example is ASX Project, another is in Northern Trust - relates to custody. And, corporate actions. Vipin will reach out to find out if there is more publically available data to slot into the obstacle sections to say how the use case addresses obstacles. RMG Royal Mint Gold - tokenization of gold held in the Royal Mint, a project that failed due to the lack of customers.  

...

Aim for a comprehensive picture that includes obstacles and links to Stan's use case project.

Projects

Mani worked on Standards - added a section on ISDA CDM. Business process standards - legal agreements, each contract ie derivative contract, through the use of smart contracts - common domain models (CDM). 

Saptarshi asks - How do we quantify matrixes for ROI for specific use cases. What are the right parameters to determine ROI with customers? Vipin notes review of company, finances, team, trying to project ROI of a particular solution. As part of a business case you present for any new project; ROI clock is very important. BAAS? Serverless? Look at Amazon, Google, Microsoft are doing will help? 

From a business perspective - what are the revenue drivers for the vertical and specific customer in the vertical? What are additional considerations, different segments, different layers? Try to see do they have anything technical implemented in their ecosystem. Or are we the first guys to start from scratch. IE no IT in Arts arena, some customers who have IT. What is the impact of business and revenue? Data integration. Specifics of blockchain from a high level, then narrow in to the customer. Identify or segregate verticals, customers, revenue streams, connectors in revenue streams. Primary, secondary levels of revenue streams. What will benefit them and what re the challenges. Not blockchain aspect - business space - 1.5 months to complete. Data integration - if legacy infrastructure - architect addresses specific quesitons. Data in silos is a challenge. BAAS - NYC - hold data, do not push to cloud. How do you implement blockchain when the customer is not willing to push data to the cloud? Design of data architecture - challenge. Saptarshi works in the public sector primarily.

Questions to ask? to support quantifying ROI.