...
Cancun is just hitting public testnets and Core Devs are setting their sights on Prague, the next EL update to Ethereum. Scoping is underway from the Besu Maintainers and we wanted to share some thoughts. Besu's team is a little different than many client teams in that we are part of the Hyperledger Foundation. We have a set of maintainers that represent themselves and the project, not necessarily their employers. To that end, we wanted to share our team's take on the Prague fork and what we would like to see.
How the sausage is made
...
When the decentralized Besu team discusses scope for forks, we like to take a champion-based approach. Maintainers that want to propose or progress scope/EIPs must be the evangelizer, both to the other team members and to the Core Dev community. Below, the champions will break down what they want to see in the next fork fo rk and why. Let's get the items we have a complete consensus on out of the way first.
...
EOF (Danno)
pros, cons, next steps
...
EOAs & Next Steps (Gary, Danno 
, Justin)
pros, cons, next steps
...
- EIP-7377 - EOA Upgrade / Migration Transactions
- EIP-3074 - AUTH and AUTHCALL
- EIP-5003 - AUTHUSURP
- EIP-3607 - Reject transactions from senders with deployed code
Gotta figure this one out ^^^
Deposit Flow Updates (Fabio)
pros, cons, next steps
...
EIP-6110
Have to discus EIP 7002 and decide vs 6110
Inclusion Lists (Justim)
pros, cons, next steps
...
Do we want to move this to the CREEP section? Or are we ready to champoion?
SETCODE (Daniel)
pros, cons, next steps
...
Do we have consensus on this one?
EIP-4444 - History Expiry (Matt)
pros, cons, next steps
No-Brainers
EIP-2537 - BLS Precompile
EIP-7212 - Precompile for Secp256R1
Anti-Goals (or, creep)
Verkle (Karim)
Pros, cons, why not now?