Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

We are also going to work on it by adding some more aggregators and even publish a paper in the future!

What we did

  • The Project was about creating a benchmarking framework for blockchain aggregators – Token Bridge Aggregators, Token Pool Aggregators, On-chain liquidity Aggregators, and Cross-chain Message Aggregators.
  • We did so by performing a theoretical analysis of each of the aggregators by diving into their GitHub, developer documentations, and blog posts.
  • We then created scripts that interact with these aggregators

...

  • by querying for routes, handling these routes, and executing the routes.
  • We also created a standardized benchmarking schema

...

  • to analyze the heterogenous aggregator routes for fee, latency, downtime, etc.
  • We also created testing scripts for these aggregators along with custom data types. The tests found results that were inconsistent with the aggregator developer docs and those were reported on the aggregators discord.
  • We also constantly upgraded our benchmarking with aggregator upgrades. Hyperlane, CCIP, and Hashi upgraded during the course of the mentorship and we benchmarked the older and new versions and discussed the differences in the report.

Statistics across the mentorship

...