00:11:30 Sam Curren (TelegramSam): https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16320908 00:18:54 Drummond Reed: Many people are going to have that same confusion - they are going to be looking for how to establish DID connections and they will not know that the protocol is called DID Exchange. 00:29:06 George Aristy: yes 00:40:51 John Callahan - Veridium: Good stuff but info overload for me at the moment 00:43:00 Samuel Smith: Background: Semantically ordering should be important in data structures in general for lots of reasons but efficient implementation of hash algorithms for key:value dicts were not ordered so ordering was not enforced. Now there are effcient algorithms for key: value hash so ordering now can be required. Although JSON arrays are ordered the lack of ordering for key:value and the idea that set operations can be used on unordered arrays led Json-ld down an unordered path. These are artifacts of JSON JavaScript 00:43:14 Samuel Smith: And artifacts of JSON-LD 00:54:14 Markus Sabadello: I believe the reason why arrays in JSON-LD are by default unordered is that RDF is the underlying graph model, and nodes/arcs in graphs are naturally unordered. 00:54:34 Drummond Reed: +1 00:57:18 Markus Sabadello: Caching is an open topic in DID Resolution, see e.g. https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-resolution/#caching and https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/10 00:59:06 Drummond Reed: I like Robert’s suggestion 01:03:34 Samuel Smith: @Markus good clarification 01:09:53 Markus Sabadello: For service endpoints that are DIDs, see e.g. https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-resolution/#redirect and https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/7 01:10:06 John Callahan - Veridium: where are we holding subsequent discussion regarding service endpoints? 01:11:37 John Callahan - Veridium: thx 01:24:30 Oskar van Deventer (TNO): FYI: find Peer DID here - https://openssi.github.io/peer-did-method-spec 01:27:11 Oskar van Deventer (TNO): FYI: find Daniel's presented doc here - https://dhh1128.github.io/peer-did-method-spec/#reserved-values 01:31:02 Oskar van Deventer (TNO): FYI: dind Daniel's predefined identities here - https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-rfcs/tree/master/features/0114-predefined-identities 01:38:21 Drummond Reed: Thanks Oskar! 01:38:29 Steve McCown: Daniel: I really like your peer did presentation — very insightful. On the Reserved Values section, you mentioned not needing to check for the reserved values, in code, since they’re unlikely to randomly occur. I would probably recommend checking for those values, since not checking for them could have unforeseen results. 01:38:55 Daniel Hardman: Yes. My imp has a function to recognize them. 01:39:20 Daniel Hardman: We have to check for them because malicious people might use them—not so much because true randomness introduces risk.